THE POLITICS OF HEALTHCARE
Virtually every day, the media, government officials, hospital administrators,
etc. remind the public about the desperate state of the healthcare system in
Canada. Inadequate financial resources to fund the needs of an aging population,
lack of specialists, long surgical waiting lists and high drug and equipment
costs are examples cited about how this has become a national crisis. Recently,
the B.C. Liberal government has announced that they will de-insure the services
of supplementary healthcare practitioners such as naturopathic physicians, chiropractors,
massage therapists and physiotherapists in order to save some money. This move
shows the value the government places on non-drug, non-surgical, complimentary
healthcare and reinforces the reality of a tiered medical system. Proposed changes
to the Drug Pharmacare program will undoubtedly affect many who regularly use
prescription drugs such as seniors and people suffering from chronic illness.
So how did it get to this point where the once internationally respected Canadian
healthcare model is now barely functional?
There is an old saying that goes like this "If you keep doing what you're
doing, you'll keep getting what you got". Perhaps it is time to change
the paradigm in which the system is being operated. Presently, we use a reactive
healthcare system. The system begins to work when a person is already ill. Doctors
and nurses initiate tests and examinations, which ultimately lead to treatment.
If the problem is simple e.g. a broken arm then the examination (an X-ray) and
treatment (casting) is straightforward and not too costly. This is where high
tech, conventional medicine shines. But if for example a person suffers from
diabetes, asthma, heart disease, cancer, or one of the many other several thousand
chronic degenerative conditions, the solution is not so simple. Typically, years
of disease management that requires numerous expensive tests and costly drug
and surgical therapies will be necessary. These conditions will need tens or
hundreds of thousand of dollars to manage with no expectation of a cure at this
time.
But what if we introduce a proactive healthcare model where self-responsibility
is promoted and the system begins to work before a person becomes ill? Wellness
would be the goal and prevention of disease the main task. Ideally, healthcare
professionals from all disciplines would work together in an integrated manner
utilizing their combined areas of expertise. They would educate and council
the public on the basic principle of good health e.g. nutritious eating, exercise,
stress management, risk management, environmental health etc. Treatment would
be employed when necessary. We as a culture cannot expect good health when the
food, air and water supply is adulterated and contaminated to the extent that
it is with chemical by products eventually finding their way into our bodies.
Obesity is rampant, as exercise is devoid and being sedentary is the new way
of life with remote controls for everything. Half the world is on antidepressants,
tranquilizers and sedatives because of personal, family and global stresses,
which lead to unhappiness, fear, anger, worry and guilt. Mental health is at
an all time low.
We need to begin to treat the cause of illness not the symptoms. The cause of
illness is not difficult to understand when you understand the laws of physiology
and nature. The body and the planet continually strive to remain in harmonious
balance in order to function optimally. Man becomes ill when those laws are
broken repetitively and balance can no longer be maintained. Some drug corporations
do not care if you understand these laws as they sell products to address mostly
the symptoms of disease. Health comes from the farm not the pharmacy.
If we as a society can begin to educate our youth on these principles and seriously
deal with the cause of illness, the benefits will show themselves over a matter
of time. Patience will be required. Not only will the population be healthier
but also the need for surgery, drug therapy, and crisis intervention will be
lessened and a lot of resources saved.
I am not naïve. I do appreciate the benefits of modern technology and medicine.
I understand the realities of genetics, aging, viruses and disharmony between
differing medical philosophies but I also understand where we are headed. The
present system will not change overnight but something does need to change.
This is one opinion.
Copyright © 2003 by Dr. Garrett G. Swetlikoff